126k
12k
| Comment | Author | Article | Comment At |
|---|---|---|---|
| The level of corruption is unreal they are not trying to hide anymore | MøchīmānnĒ On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| Remember Saliba last year???? | Mo On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| Start speaking up and saying what it is THEY ARE FIXING IT FOR LIVERPOOL | Notorious On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| Remember when they said yesterday they couldn't conclusively say that Salah touched the ball | Loic On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| It’s exactly the same argument as the Saliba head clash last season. Except that was given and this wasn’t. Fixing it before our eyes | Alex Stott On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| Forget that, Saka had the ball in the Newcastle box when he blew, so lost the chance to score. Terrible refereeing | GOLFHO On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| it DOES matter lol 😂 | levi On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| That was a clear diving bro | Manny On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:49 GMT |
| What the f**k !!!!!! 😂😂 | Sadid On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:49 GMT |
| That is absolutely laughable. So as long as you get the slightest of touches as the keeper you can then foul the striker and prevent them getting a tap in. | Paul On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:49 GMT |
| Viktor got a touch to go around and got clattered | The Retro Grill On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:49 GMT |
| Same old Arsenal fans always crying 😭 | Helter-skelter On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:49 GMT |
| Also brutal that Saka got to that ball in a dangerous position but the play is just dead… bad call in both regards | JP On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:49 GMT |
| PGMOL corruption again | gunnersaurus On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:49 GMT |
| If they’re playing that game, the best time someone gets the ball but follows through high they can’t send them off. That is utter madness, he didn’t play the ball it was kick at him | TomP AFC On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:49 GMT |
| Knew we weren't gonna get it Liverpool fan ref | itsLeanne On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:49 GMT |
| LOLLLL DO WE NEED TO MAKE ANOTHER REFEREE GETTING FIRED THIS SEASON? #NEWARS | MadGunnerst On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:48 GMT |
| Pope wouldn’t even touch gyokeres if gyokeres didn’t leave his leg dangling | Man On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:48 GMT |
| I can't believe it. Corruption happened right before our own eyes lol | JM On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:48 GMT |
| It’s wild that this doesn’t matter to the refs, should be a nailed on pen | Duncan Sinclair On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:48 GMT |
| That is a disgusting decision. Game’s gone. | Craig Stevens On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:47 GMT |
| Hahahahahaha what!? 😂😂😂😂 | FPLCommanders On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:47 GMT |
| It’s not a pen idiot , stop crying | protobare On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:47 GMT |
| He's had nearly a year to get results and he hasn't been good enough | Shaun Quinn On | Ratcliffe backs Amorim, urges patience after £236m summer spree at Manchester United | 28 Sep 2025 15:46 GMT |
| Ratcliffe is like that one gambler who believes that after putting 200m he can still win a jackpot when he has sold all his assets | Kio On | Ratcliffe backs Amorim, urges patience after £236m summer spree at Manchester United | 28 Sep 2025 15:41 GMT |
| The whole lot can go if that’s their solution | Big Jim On | Southgate to Man United? INEOS admiration sparks noise, but no talks yet | 28 Sep 2025 15:18 GMT |
| Thank you very much for the news | KROP On | Southgate to Man United? INEOS admiration sparks noise, but no talks yet | 28 Sep 2025 15:13 GMT |
| Oliver Glasner should be the target bc of we're already playing the same formation Andoni Iraola Fabian Hurzeler | Lxrdss11 On | Manchester United shortlist Glasner, Hürzeler and Iraola as contingency if Amorim is sacked | 28 Sep 2025 15:06 GMT |
| So, Gareth Southgate's still in the mix for Man United, but it's not a done deal yet. Looks like INEOS rates him, but no active talks—guess we'll see what happens! ⚽🔴 | Jack On | Southgate to Man United? INEOS admiration sparks noise, but no talks yet | 28 Sep 2025 15:06 GMT |
| Thought it was Dan Ashworth who wanted him. See how gullible Manchester United fans are 🤡 | Nozi 🌹🦋💐 Kvaratskhelia🌹MUFC 🧎🏽♀️ On | Southgate to Man United? INEOS admiration sparks noise, but no talks yet | 28 Sep 2025 15:04 GMT |