126k
12k
| Comment | Author | Article | Comment At |
|---|---|---|---|
| What the hell is this agenda that they have against us bro???? | Thiba_mowe On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| It's a dive, should have been booked for being a cheating cnut. | Milxan On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| this is fucking diabolical, if we don't win man.. | 𝐌𝐚𝐲𝐨𝐫 𝐇𝐨𝐛𝐛𝐬 On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| Sanchez was outside the box & the challenge was reckless, how thick are you? | Ollie On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| We got robbed, not you! | not sorry cfc On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| EPL referees are disgusting | moefire.eth 🔥 On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| The fact that you even the commentators are saying is not a penalty is fucking embarassing!! Utter corruption!! | 𝑻𝒂𝒚𝒂 𝑩𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒐 On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| I'm done with these fucking retarded refs | yuga On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| Cheats. Pure and simple. | PD On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| Keep crying and making excuses, it’s never a penalty. Gyokerass is a dirty thug who’s diving. | Dax™ 🪐 On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:53 GMT |
| Absolutely the same fucken thing!!!! 😡 | Thiba_mowe On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:52 GMT |
| EPL referees are disgusting ! | moefire.eth 🔥 On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:52 GMT |
| We just want consistency | Kev On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:52 GMT |
| Never trust the refs again | BLOCKXS.COM On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:52 GMT |
| ITS A FUCKING DISGRACE AND CORRUPTION | Arsenal FC On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:52 GMT |
| And they gave pope the ball after when Saka had it when the ref blew his whistle... Just garbage... | Marc On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:52 GMT |
| Saka has a tap in if he lets it play | Dk On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:51 GMT |
| The ball was still in play as well. He fouled him after. Another novel decision going against Arsenal, as usual. | N On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:51 GMT |
| If he don't blow his whistle Saka taps it in as well | TØM 🌐 On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:51 GMT |
| 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 | Nacho🦇 On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:51 GMT |
| I cannot believe what i just saw. Gyokeres would have still scored. Plus didnt Saliba nick the ball from Pedro's header last year at Brighton? | Kaushal_AFC On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:51 GMT |
| The English premier league what a joke | cuiny mullano On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:51 GMT |
| They're very inconsistent | Ebenezer Fasinu On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:51 GMT |
| Literally identical 😂😂😂😂 | 🌫️AJ On | No, This Wasn’t ‘Robbery’: Why the Pope Incident Differs from Sánchez and the Gyökeres Comparisons | 28 Sep 2025 15:51 GMT |
| I still remember when Saliba got a touch on the ball and then clashed heads with Joao Pedro! Oh wait that was the ball hitting Saliba not Saliba touching the ball 🤔 | Boring Boring Arsenal On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:51 GMT |
| Two weeks ago chelsea goalkeeper does the same thing and gets a red. Disgrace | Sumdoggio88 On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| It’s a red card for denying a goal scoring opportunity | Mike Schneider On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| If Pope has played the ball how is it not a fucking corner? Corruption. Pure and simple. | Coulsey On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| The level of corruption is unreal they are not trying to hide anymore | MøchīmānnĒ On | Brighton penalty debate: why Saliba’s ‘touch on the ball’ still equals a foul — and why VAR was right | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |
| Remember Saliba last year???? | Mo On | Not a Penalty: Why the Pope–Gyokeres Collision Was Correctly Given Against the Attacker | 28 Sep 2025 15:50 GMT |