Inside Bayern’s vetoed Xavi Simons move: Eberl, Kompany and Freund had a deal — push to revive transfer after Coman exit

Bayern’s football leadership targeted Xavi Simons as the marquee replacement on the flank/No.10 after a major outgoing on the wing. Max Eberl, Vincent Kompany and Christoph Freund aligned on the profile and reached full agreement on contractual terms with the Dutch international. However, the supervisory board stepped in late and vetoed the operation. Despite the setback, internal momentum remains: Kompany sees Simons as an immediate system fit, and the sporting department is preparing a renewed push in the next window. Expect Bayern to revisit structures (loan with obligation or an amortized fee) to unlock the deal swiftly.

In Munich, following an outgoing in the wide positions, Bayern’s sporting hierarchy accelerated talks for an attacking reinforcement who can play as a No.10 or inverted winger. With the technical staff’s approval, the club agreed personal terms with Xavi Simons and mapped out the salary, bonuses and role. The move reached the decision table of the supervisory board, where financial structure, long-term asset value, and squad balance were debated. The board ultimately declined to authorize completion at this stage. The football department, however, maintains Simons as a strategic target and is preparing revised proposals for the next market window.

The player Max Eberl spoke about in his recent interview was Xavi Simons. Signing the Dutchman was the wish of Eberl, Kompany and Freund after Kingsley Coman was sold. All contractual details with Simons had been agreed. But in the end, the supervisory board/Uli Hoeneß vetoed the

@iMiaSanMia

Impact Analysis

From a squad-building perspective, the veto delays, rather than derails, a clearly coherent plan. Xavi Simons profiles as a high-efficiency chance creator and ball-progressor who thrives between the lines, press-resists in tight spaces, and delivers end-product both as a scorer and provider. Across his last full season at top-five-league level, he produced double-digit goal contributions in all competitions, doing so while covering multiple lanes (right half-space, left half-space, central No.10). Under Vincent Kompany’s positional principles—staggered 2-3-5 in possession, aggressive rest defense, and high counter-press—Simons would slot seamlessly as an interior playmaker who can also attack the far post.

Financially, the supervisory board’s caution is understandable: elite attacking midfielders command premium fees, and amortization plus wages can weigh on long-term flexibility. Yet the sporting upside is compelling. Bayern’s current output on the right/central lane has relied on streaks; adding a consistent line-breaking carrier with final-third vision raises the team’s floor and ceiling, especially in Champions League knockout margins. Furthermore, age curve and resale dynamics strongly favor the investment. If Bayern revisits the structure—multi-year amortization, performance-triggered add-ons, or an initial loan—risk can be contained while capturing peak prime seasons. Net impact if completed next window: a material upgrade in creativity, pressing connectivity, and unpredictability.

Reaction

Fan sentiment is polarized. A vocal segment blames the hierarchy for missing a transformative profile, arguing Kompany has already improved wide forwards and would likely elevate Simons further. They cite the coach’s recent uptick in output from existing attackers as evidence that the Dutchman, with superior ball-carrying and combination play, would accelerate the attack immediately. Others counter that Serge Gnabry’s resurgence reduces urgency and that Simons, while very good, is not a once-in-a-generation talent. This group expresses minimal regret and urges focus on a like-for-like wide finisher instead.

There are also skepticism threads, questioning character fit or adaptation risk in a high-pressure dressing room. Some even point to external leagues and claim he’s “struggling” elsewhere—claims that remain unverified and should be treated cautiously. A pragmatic faction believes the veto was a timing and structure issue, not a rejection of the player, expecting Bayern to return with a revised package. Across discussions, two constants emerge: broad respect for Kompany’s developmental track record and recognition that the club needs another reliable source of line-breaking actions and final-third invention to complement Musiala and the existing wing cohort.

Social reactions

Imagine xavi in this Team. Shit Man i bet He regret a little that He cant join them this summer .

Testomax22 (@Testomax221)

i backed you from the beginning mate love you 🫂

haseeb (@haseebAFK)

We could've had Simons but got Jackson instead

KingCold (@KingCold1350095)

Prediction

Expect Bayern to re-open negotiations early in the next window with a structure that de-risks the move for the board while preserving immediate sporting value. The most realistic pathways are: (1) a loan with a defined obligation contingent on appearances or Champions League qualification; (2) a straight purchase with add-ons heavily tied to team performance and player milestones; or (3) a hybrid arrangement with delayed payment tranches. PSG’s stance historically favors retaining control over high-upside assets, so Bayern’s proposal will likely emphasize guaranteed development minutes, a core role, and a transparent pathway to trophies.

Tactically, Kompany would deploy Simons primarily as a No.10 in a 4-2-3-1, rotating to the right half-space to overload and create cutback lanes, with license to invert and attack the box’s blindside. Against low blocks, his gravity would free Musiala to dribble in optimal zones; versus high presses, his press-resistance would improve Bayern’s first-exit quality. Assuming a successful revisit, integration could be rapid—preseason or winter camp would be enough to drill automatisms. If the board remains unconvinced, Bayern may pivot to profiles with similar micro-attributes (carry-to-create, press-resistance, high engine), but Simons remains Plan A given age, output and stylistic fit.

Latest today

• Bayern accelerate talks to extend Konrad Laimer beyond 2027 under Kompany Bayern accelerate talks to extend Konrad Laimer beyond 2027 under Kompany
• Why Middlesbrough’s denied penalty was the correct call: a referee’s-eye breakdown Why Middlesbrough’s denied penalty was the correct call: a referee’s-eye breakdown
• Arteta’s personal pitch convinces family as Arsenal finalize deal for teenage sensation Arteta’s personal pitch convinces family as Arsenal finalize deal for teenage sensation
• "Arsenal is our club": Max Dowman rejects Barca and Chelsea as Hale End jewel commits to Gunners pathway "Arsenal is our club": Max Dowman rejects Barca and Chelsea as Hale End jewel commits to Gunners pathway

Conclusion

The veto paused a near-finished plan, but all footballing indicators still point one way: Bayern and Xavi Simons are an excellent match. The sporting department’s alignment—Eberl’s market reading, Freund’s deal architecture, and Kompany’s tactical blueprint—forms a unified case for revival. With modest creativity in payment structure, the board’s risk filters can be satisfied without compromising squad optimization. Strategically, Bayern need another reliable line-breaker who can both assist and finish; Simons offers exactly that, while fitting the club’s intensity and pressing ethos.

Short term, patience and precision will matter more than speed. Medium term, this is the kind of acquisition that compounds: it lifts chance creation, stabilizes output variability on the right/central lane, and broadens in-game solutions against European elites. Fans may debate timing and alternatives, but the data and tactical logic are convergent. Expect Bayern back at the table—and this time, with a structure that turns alignment on the pitch into a signature off it.