Not90m.Com brings you the latest football stories, transfer buzz, and match talk that every fan loves. Simple, fast, and all about the game we live for.

Transfers

Manchester United step up Elliot Anderson pursuit as Forest set £100–120m price; Newcastle keep watch

14k 1k

27 Oct, 2025 19:37 GMT, US

Manchester United have accelerated efforts to sign Elliot Anderson from Nottingham Forest, with Forest indicating a price in the £100–120m range. Newcastle United, Anderson’s boyhood club, are also monitoring developments. Despite the steep valuation and a contract understood to run until 2029, there’s growing confidence United can structure a deal that satisfies Forest’s stance and PSR realities. Anderson’s athletic, press-resistant, box-to-box profile maps cleanly onto United’s midfield blueprint, offering drive, verticality and homegrown quota value. United view him as a plug-and-play left-sided No.8 who can elevate intensity and ball progression immediately.

Manchester United step up Elliot Anderson pursuit as Forest set £100–120m price; Newcastle keep watch

Multiple UK and European outlets report that Manchester United and Newcastle United are closely tracking Elliot Anderson after his breakout at Nottingham Forest, where he has been valued between £100–120m. The 22-year-old midfielder, a homegrown product who moved to Forest in 2024, is tied to a long-term deal believed to run until 2029. Forest’s stance reflects both Anderson’s importance and the Premier League’s Profit & Sustainability dynamics, with any departure needing to be premium. The timing points to an opportunistic move in the next window, as clubs refine their midfield options and squad homegrown balance.

🚨 JUST IN: Manchester United and Newcastle are closely monitoring Elliot Anderson. Nottingham Forest will ask for a transfer fee in the region of £100M– £120M. [@Plettigoal]

@UtdXclusive

Impact Analysis

Elliot Anderson’s profile is a near-ideal fit for what Manchester United have lacked: a high-energy left-sided No.8 who knits pressing triggers with incisive carries and smart off-ball occupation. At Forest, Anderson’s minute-to-minute intensity has stood out—he drives through the first line, protects possession under contact, and arrives late into the box. For United, that bridges the gap between a ball-winner and their creative outlets, enabling quicker transitions and better territory control. His homegrown status also matters; beyond registration benefits, it aligns with United’s strategy to secure prime-age British talent with re-sale and leadership upside.

The valuation—£100–120m—will spark debate, but in today’s Premier League market it’s tethered to scarcity. Clubs are paying for proven PL adaptability and multi-phase midfielders who can both press and progress. United’s recruitment under a modern structure has targeted players who can sustain high-intensity football over 90 minutes; Anderson fits that mold better than a pure creator or a destroyer. He also complements rather than duplicates existing profiles, which reduces tactical friction and accelerates assimilation. If United land him, the midfield’s athletic ceiling rises immediately, potentially altering their pressing efficiency and final-third entries by spring.

Reaction

Fan reaction splits along predictably sharp lines. A large segment decries a perceived “United tax,” arguing Forest would quote one price to United and a lower one to rivals. Many call the fee excessive for a player still building his top-end résumé, pitching valuations in the £50–65m bracket instead. Others point out Anderson’s long contract and rising curve give Forest all the leverage; if clubs want him now, they must pay 2025 prices for a homegrown, Premier League-proven midfielder.

There’s also a tactical debate. A vocal contingent insists United should prioritize a specialist defensive midfielder over another box-to-box eight, name-checking alternatives like Adam Wharton or Morten Hjulmand as cleaner fits. Skeptics question whether Anderson’s output justifies the nine-figure tier, while optimists counter that his press resistance, ball-carrying and engine translate directly into field tilt and chance volume for United’s forwards. A few fans, taking a pragmatic stance, predict a compromise package with add-ons bringing the headline figure down. Overall, curiosity and excitement are tempered by sticker shock—but there’s broad agreement that Anderson’s playing style is the right archetype for United’s next evolution.

Social reactions

Are they drunk? I heard his name like 3rd time (like most of the people) and they want 100m😭😭

martiinkoo (@martiinkoo)

Leave him o, he's not worth it

TceeUTD (@TceeDot1)

£100M as how nah 😂

Dray👑 (@naughtydray101)

Prediction

Expect United to test Forest’s stance with a structured bid: a base fee in the £70–80m corridor plus performance-based add-ons, sweetened by achievable milestones tied to appearances and European qualification. Forest, conscious of PSR windows but not under immediate pressure to sell, will push to protect their valuation with sell-on clauses and Champions League-related uplifts. A player-plus-cash construct could surface if United can place a peripheral asset who suits Forest’s age profile and wage model.

Newcastle’s presence is real but nuanced. Anderson’s roots on Tyneside make a reunion compelling, yet the economics are steep and Forest’s premium pricing for a direct Premier League rival may deter a full-scale push unless outgoings materialize. United’s edge lies in timing and squad need: Anderson walks into minutes and responsibility at Old Trafford, and his homegrown status streamlines registration. If talks gather pace early in the window, momentum swings United’s way, with medicals and media obligations queued rapidly once headline terms are agreed. Barring a late bid from an unexpected Champions League suitor, the most likely scenario is United closing a bonus-laden deal that lands near the psychological £100m marker, with clauses balancing risk for both clubs.

Latest today

Conclusion

The contours of this chase are clear: Nottingham Forest are right to demand a premium for a long-contract, ascending homegrown midfielder, while Manchester United are equally right to press for a player whose attributes so neatly solve on-pitch problems. Strip away the price noise and the football logic is striking—Anderson’s blend of stamina, carry-and-release, and second-phase pressing is exactly what United have needed to stabilize transitions and sustain pressure. Yes, the fee is heavy, but it buys certainty in adaptation and time horizon in a position that’s hard to fill.

From a veteran’s eye, Anderson won’t just fill a shirt; he’ll change how United connect the thirds. That’s why, despite the static of “United tax” discourse, I’m confident this moves from monitoring to agreement once structure and add-ons align. Forest will be compensated at the level their stance deserves, United will secure a prime-age engine room pillar, and Anderson will step onto a stage that amplifies his game. This is the right player, at the right time, for the right tactical need—expect decisive movement, not dithering.

Michael Brown

Michael Brown

Senior Editor

A former professional footballer who continues to follow teams and players closely, providing insightful evaluations of their performances and form.

Comments (21)

  • 27 October, 2025

    martiinkoo

    Are they drunk? I heard his name like 3rd time (like most of the people) and they want 100m😭😭

  • 27 October, 2025

    TceeUTD

    Leave him o, he's not worth it

  • 27 October, 2025

    Dray👑

    £100M as how nah 😂

  • 27 October, 2025

    Kai

    Everything relating to transfers is 100m nowadays in EPL🙄

  • 27 October, 2025

    DtunesRico

    😂😂

  • 27 October, 2025

    United Fanatics Adda

    We need a Proper Dm to replace Casemiro not a another box to box mid. We should go for wharton instead or Hjumland. most of English talents are overrated.

  • 27 October, 2025

    Champion John/ (NkosiNathi)

    Ah 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • 27 October, 2025

    Lucia Masarirevu

    He is going to stay there then! As much as we like him

  • 27 October, 2025

    Onwudinjo Emmanuel-mario

    please this guy is a fugazi, he is not what you thing, English media overhype. Please Noooo

  • 27 October, 2025

    Ash Talks Football

    Nottingham Forest would quote 100M for Man Utd to buy Elliot Anderson only to sell him to Man City for 65M👀😤 Just frustrated of “The United Tax” - Love the player but needs to achieve more to justify that valuation. #MUFC

  • 27 October, 2025

    (fan) Divine

    Good player is he really worth that amount or because Man United are involved

  • 27 October, 2025

    .

    £100m 😭😭😭😭

  • 27 October, 2025

    Ashish Nair

    He has a contract till 2029 so he ain't going anywhere then.

  • 27 October, 2025

    king walker

    Am not surprise at all mafia boss Marinakis will never let him leave without a bloody fight

  • 27 October, 2025

    Nera

    😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 British with over pricing

  • 27 October, 2025

    jensun

    Fucking hell 120m

  • 27 October, 2025

    Frankie19802

    Forest arent even worth £100m

  • 27 October, 2025

    Izuchukwu E.A

    £100M for what exactly?. He's not more or less than £55

  • 27 October, 2025

    Jazzman Manganyi

    So meaning he will stay longer over there

  • 27 October, 2025

    Deep Tawar

    And we'll finalize it under 50m

  • 22 October, 2025

    Freedom Not Terror

    Hamas keeps choosing terror. For freedom, Hamas must go.

Related Articles