Oliver Kahn reveals Bayern passed on Nico Schlotterbeck at Freiburg — the ripple effects now

Oliver Kahn has disclosed that Bayern Munich seriously evaluated Nico Schlotterbeck during his Freiburg spell but ultimately decided against a move due to the defender’s age and stage of development. The remark has reignited debate about Bayern’s centre-back planning after recent reshapes at the position, while also highlighting how well Schlotterbeck has matured at Borussia Dortmund. With Bayern now anchored by the likes of Kim Min-jae and Dayot Upamecano, and Dortmund benefiting from Schlotterbeck’s growth, the comment offers a timely lens on talent timing, risk tolerance and market dynamics in Germany. It also dovetails with Bayern’s broader roster recalibration, including Michael Olise’s future-proof contract stance.

In recent remarks to German media, former Bayern Munich CEO Oliver Kahn reflected on internal discussions from the period when Nico Schlotterbeck was still at SC Freiburg. Kahn said Bayern weighed a move but ultimately felt the step was too early, while the player also faced a key career decision. The comments arrive with Schlotterbeck now established at Borussia Dortmund and amid Bayern’s ongoing squad evolution, including changes at centre-back and public clarity around new signings’ contracts.

Oliver Kahn says Bayern considered signing Nico Schlotterbeck when he was at Freiburg but then decided against it: "Yes, I remember. It was the time when he was still playing in Freiburg, and he had to make a decision. But because he was still very, very young, we decided on

@iMiaSanMia

Impact Analysis

Kahn’s reflection underscores a perennial dilemma for elite recruiters: when to bet on raw upside versus when to prioritize immediate reliability at Champions League level. Passing on Schlotterbeck at Freiburg was, in that moment, a defensible risk calculation. Centre-backs often peak later, and a premature leap into Bayern’s high-exposure environment can bruise confidence and asset value. In hindsight, Dortmund’s environment offered Schlotterbeck a steadier runway: regular minutes, a clearly defined role on the left side of a back four, and tactical demands that cultivated his progressive passing and aggressive front-foot defending.

For Bayern, the comment lands in the context of a defense that has been retooled across two seasons. With Matthijs de Ligt moving on in 2024 and the rotation leaning on Kim Min-jae and Dayot Upamecano, the profile mix has shifted. Meanwhile, Aleksandar Pavlović’s metronomic distribution in midfield reduces the pressure on centre-backs to force progression, altering the skill balance Bayern prioritize at the back. The Olise contract note (no release clause) illustrates Bayern’s tighter control over core assets after recent windows taught hard lessons about leverage.

For Dortmund, Schlotterbeck’s maturation validates their development pathway and reinforces valuation strength. He has become a left-footed anchor, valuable in build-up and set-piece phases. From a market perspective, Kahn’s remark will be read less as regret and more as a case study in timing: Bayern waited; Dortmund invested; the player blossomed. The competitive equilibrium between the two clubs reflects these divergent bets.

Reaction

Fan discussion split into familiar camps. One side argues Bayern’s call was prudent at the time: inserting a very young centre-back into Bayern’s win-now cauldron could have amplified errors and stalled development. They point to how scrutiny has swallowed defenders before and stress that Dortmund’s nurturing context accelerated Schlotterbeck’s curve. Others question the timing of Kahn’s disclosure, reading it as needless hindsight or subtle PR that frames Bayern’s scouting as “right idea, wrong time.”

Bayern-focused voices counter that the club ultimately secured balance, citing Pavlović’s calm passing metrics as evidence the current structure doesn’t require a high-risk progressive LCB. They also highlight clear messaging around Michael Olise’s contract—no release clause—as proof Bayern are being deliberate about squad-building and retention. Some analysts reference past centre-back churn (including de Ligt’s departure) to argue that Bayern’s technical profile at the position is still being fine-tuned.

Dortmund supporters largely view the remarks as backhanded validation: Schlotterbeck grew into a leadership presence and on-ball conduit precisely because he played through mistakes. Neutral observers see a broader lesson about player development environments and the importance of consistent minutes for high-ceiling defenders.

Social reactions

Totally sensible decision back then and the Media would've eaten him alive if he would've made the same mistakes he did at Dortmund. But he's developed over the past couple of years into a top player, but who knows if that would've been possible with us.

NR6Fifa (@FifaNr6)

He was as age as de ligt

Ali Mosavi (@mosavi5688)

Of course I remember that we were considering him but the jump is probably too high. He has developed nicely now, why are we making it like we missed out on it as if he would make that same jump here?

Obsessed with you (@812angelofdeath)

Prediction

Short term, expect no concrete movement between Bayern and Dortmund over Schlotterbeck. Direct transfers between the rivals are rare and require a perfect storm of contract, timing, and player intent. Scenario A: Dortmund move swiftly to fortify Schlotterbeck’s status with improved terms that reflect his role and market interest, preserving leverage. Scenario B: Bayern continue to optimize their back line internally, focusing on role clarity for Kim and Upamecano while scanning the market for a left-footed option outside direct rivals—particularly in Serie A and Ligue 1, where progressive LCBs with aerial security often emerge.

Medium term, should Bayern feel the need for a left-footed organizer, they will likely pursue a profile match rather than a rivalry bid, leveraging their data models on duel timing, carry volume under pressure, and diagonal pass success into the half-spaces. Dortmund, for their part, can frame Schlotterbeck as a cornerstone, anchoring build-up with a stable midfield platform. Kahn’s remark will fade into the background, but the structural choices it highlights—patience versus immediate return—will continue to define both clubs’ approaches.

Longer term, if Schlotterbeck’s trajectory continues upward and a release mechanism ever appears, the Bundesliga’s power dynamics could reopen that discussion. For now, the pragmatic path favors continuity.

Latest today

• Lisandro Martínez injury update: Amorim dodges timeline as knee work stays separate Lisandro Martínez injury update: Amorim dodges timeline as knee work stays separate
• Maguire and Mount doubtful vs Brighton; Martínez still out — United rocked pre-weekend Maguire and Mount doubtful vs Brighton; Martínez still out — United rocked pre-weekend
• Bayern shut down Olise release-clause talk as Premier League giants circle Bayern shut down Olise release-clause talk as Premier League giants circle
• EFL dock Sheffield Wednesday 12 points after club enters administration EFL dock Sheffield Wednesday 12 points after club enters administration

Conclusion

Oliver Kahn’s candid note about Bayern passing on Nico Schlotterbeck is less a confession than a window into elite roster calculus. At the time, Bayern chose certainty over incubation; Dortmund chose the developmental runway. Each club’s identity is visible in the outcome: Bayern kept the title-or-bust rhythm, Dortmund compounded upside through minutes and responsibility. The data story underneath—error tolerance, progression value from a left-footed CB, and the psychological cost of learning at the top—explains why two rational actors made different bets.

Today, the landscape has evolved. Bayern’s spine now leans on Kim, Upamecano and a possession stabilizer in Pavlović, while the club locks in key attackers like Olise with strong contractual control. Dortmund possess a prime-age, left-sided centre-back who powers both structure and set pieces. The takeaway is not regret; it is fit and timing. If anything, Kahn’s remark underscores that success in modern recruitment is as much about the environment you offer as the player you pick. In that light, both clubs can claim they executed their strategy—and the table will judge the rest.